J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1969. 28:465-472.
© 1969 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vermedahl, L. D.
Right arrow Articles by Rust, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vermedahl, L. D.
Right arrow Articles by Rust, J. W.

Effects of Energy Intake of the Dam on Reproductive Performance, Development of Offspring and Carcass Characteristics1, 2,

L. D. Vermedahl3, R. J. Meade, H. E. Hanke4 and J. W. Rust5

University of Minnesota, St. Paul

Abstract

Ninety-two gilts averaging 110 kg. were used in two experiments conducted at two locations to determine the effects of level of feed intake (energy) during pregnancy on reproductive performance, development of offspring, and carcass characteristics and composition of lean tissue. One-half of the gilts was individually fed 1.36 kg. per head daily of a 24.5% protein diet while the remaining one-half was fed 2.27 kg. per head daily of a 15.1% protein diet during pregnancy. Fifty-nine gilts and their litters were continued through a 21-day lactation period during which one-half of the gilts from each gestation treatment was fed a 16% protein diet ad libitum while the remaining one-half of the gilts was fed the same diet to scale. Twenty-two litter units produced by gilts assigned to each gestation treatment were continued through the growing period subsequent to 21 days.

Feeding 1.36 vs. 2.27 kg. feed (approximately 4,400 vs. 7,300 kcal. ME) per gilt daily during gestation resulted in significant reductions in daily gains (0.25 vs. 0.52 kg.), condition of gilts at parturition, total pigs farrowed per litter (8.5 vs. 9.7) and birth-weight of offspring (1.38 vs. 1.48 kg.). However, number of live pigs per litter (8.5 vs.9.5) and vigor of pigs at birth were not significantly affected by feeding level during gestation. Pigs from gilts fed at the lesser level of feed intake during pregnancy weighed significantly (5.1 vs. 5.9 kg.) less at 21 days and gained significantly more efficiently (feed/gain ratios of 1.84 vs. 1.95) during the period from 21 days to about 22.7 kilograms. Level of feed intake of the dam during pregnancy did not significantly affect rate of gain during the growing period subsequent to 21 days, feed/gain ratio subsequent to 22.7 kg., dressing percent, cross-sectional area of the l. dorsi, percent trimmed ham and loin of slaughter weight or of chilled carcass, or percentages of dry matter, protein and ether extract in the lean tissue. However, backfat thickness was significantly (P<.05) increased (3.86 vs. 3.65 cm.) in offspring from gilts fed 1.36 kg. per head daily during pregnancy.

Feeding sows to scale vs. ad libitum during the 21-day lactation resulted in a significant decrease in feed consumption (76.8 vs. 97.0 kg.) accompanied by increased weight loss (15.0 vs. 5.6 kg.). Gilts fed at the lesser level of feed intake during pregnancy lost significantly less weight (3.9 vs. 15.6 kg.) during lactation than gilts receiving the greater quantity of feed during gestation. They also consumed more feed (101.5 vs. 93.0 kg.) when fed ad libitum during the 21-day lactation than gilts given the greater amount of energy during pregnancy. Feed intake of sows during lactation did not influence 21-day weights of pigs, rate and efficiency of gain during the growing period subsequent to 21 days, carcass length, backfat thickness, cross-sectional area of the l. dorsi, percent trimmed ham and loin of slaughter weight or of chilled carcass, and percentages dry matter, protein and ether extract in the lean tissue.


Footnotes

1 Paper 6655, Scientific Journal Series of the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station.

2 Acknowledgement is due Elliott Packing Co., Duluth. Minn., and Swift & Co., South St. Paul, Minn., for excellent cooperation and assistance in collection of carcass data; appreciation is also expressed to American Cyanamid Co., Princeton, N. J., and Merck Sharp and Dohme, Rahway, N. J., for generous supplies of some dietary essentials.

3 NIH Trainee in Nutrition; supported by NIH Training Grant GMO 1041 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences. Present address: Allied Mills, Inc., P.O. Box 459, Libertyville, Ill.

4 West Central Experiment Station, Morris, Minn.

5 North Central Experiment Station, Grand Rapids, Minn.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1969 by the American Society of Animal Science.