J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1968. 27:1307-1312.
© 1968 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kornegay, E. T.
Right arrow Articles by Vander Noot, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kornegay, E. T.
Right arrow Articles by Vander Noot, G. W.

Performance, Digestibility of Diet Constituents and N-Retention of Swine Fed Diets with Added Water1

E. T. Kornegay2 and G. W. Vander Noot3

New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station, New Brunswick

Abstract

Two feeding and two metabolism trials were conducted to evaluate performance, digestibility of diet constituents, N-retention and physical carcass characteristics of swine fed diets with added water. In Trial I, 42 pigs averaging 16 kg., initially, were used to compare diets containing 10 (dry), 25, 40, 55, 70 and 85% water (weight basis). High levels of water in the diet (70 and 85%) depressed feed intake and daily gain, whereas feed efficiency apparently was impaired during the first 28 days of the trial but improved the second 28 days with no over-all difference.

In Trial II, 30 pigs averaging 22 kg., initially, were used to compare diets containing 10 and 40% water. Dry matter intakes were equalized. Daily gain and feed efficiency data did not differ between pigs fed dry and 40% water diets.

In Trial III, six barrows averaging 61 kg., initially, were used in a 3x3 extra period Latin-square to study performance of pigs and digestibilities of the proximate components when diets containing 10 (dry), 40 and 85% water were fed. Daily gain and feed efficiency were depressed and urine volume increased when pigs were fed a diet with 85% water. Serum protein levels and apparent digestibilities of dry matter, crude protein, ether extract, crude fiber and N-free extract were similar for all treatments.

In Trial IV, eight barrows averaging 48 kg., initially, were used in a single changeover design with two extra periods to study performance of pigs, digestibility of dietary components and N-retention when dry and wet (85% water) diets were fed. Daily gain and feed efficiency were depressed and urine volume increased when pigs were fed a diet with 85% water. Dry matter, crude protein, ether extract and crude fiber digestibilities, and hematocrit and hemoglobin values were similar for both treatments. Energy and N-free extract digestibilities, and N-retention were less for pigs fed the 85%-water diet. Carcass measurements revealed no effect of treatment on dressing percent, backfat, carcass length or loin eye area. Neither the relative nor the absolute weights of the lung, liver, kidney, heart and spleen were different. Weights of viscera, stomach, small intestine and large intestine expressed as percentages of bodyweight did not differ.


Footnotes

1 Paper of the Journal Series, New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station. Rutgers—The State University, Department of Animal Sciences, New Brunswick.

2 Present address: Department of Animal Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg.

3 We wish to thank Mr. Frank Bielk and Mrs. Elizabeth Gilbreath for chemical analyses. Mr. Ray Wyatt for caring for the animals and Dr. R. L. Gilbreath for carcass evaluation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Professional Animal ScientistHome page
B. A. Lynn, J. E. Wohlt, P. A. Schoknecht, and M. L. Westendorf
Variation in Nutrient Content of Microbrewers Grains and Effect on Performance and Carcass Composition When Fed Wet to Growing-Finishing Swine
Professional Animal Scientist, August 1, 2009; 25(4): 426 - 433.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1968 by the American Society of Animal Science.