J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1968. 27:1006-1010.
© 1968 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maxson, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Curtin, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maxson, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Curtin, T. M.

Influence of Various Ratios of Raw and Gelatinized Corn, Oats, Oat Components and Sand on the Incidence of Esophagogastric Lesions in Swine1

D. W. Maxson2, 6,, G. R. Stanley3, 6,, T. W. Perry, R. A. Pickett and T. M. Curtin5

Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana

Abstract

Four experiments were conducted with swine to study the effect on the incidence of esophagogastric ulcers of feeding various ratios of gelatinized and raw corn, of feeding crushed whole oats or the individual components (oat groat vs. oat hull) and of feeding two roughness factors (blasting sand and cellufloc).

When two-thirds or more of the grain portion of the diet was composed of gelatinized corn, there was a significant (P<.01) increase in severity of esophagogastric lesions. The inclusion of 9% oat hulls or of 30% crushed whole oats reduced the severity of the lesions significantly (P<.01) in one experiment but had no significant effect in another. Inclusion of 21% oat groats was effective also, but not to the extent of either oat hulls or whole oats, thus indicating the apparent protective effect of the oat grain is in the hull portion. Rate of gain was not affected significantly by any of the oat treatments.

White blasting sand fed at levels of 5% or 10% of the ration was without effect on gain, efficiency of feed conversion or upon the severity of esophagogastric lesions.


Footnotes

1 Department of Animal Sciences Journal No. 3218, Purdue University of Agricultural Experiment Station. A portion of this research was supported by Grant No. AM-07730-03 of the National Institutes of Health, U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.

2 Present address: 5321/2 Sweitzer, Greenville, Ohio.

3 Present address: Route 2, Bryan, Ohio.

5 Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology. Present address: School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia.

6 The data from theses submitted to the Graduate School, Purdue University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1968 by the American Society of Animal Science.