J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1968. 27:705-708.
© 1968 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Short, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Casida, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Short, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Casida, L. E.

Effect of Exogenous Progesterone and Unilateral Ovariectomy on Ovarian and Pituitary Gland Activity1

R. E. Short, J. B. Peters, N. L. First and L. E. Casida

University of Wisconsin, Madison

Abstract

Seventy-two crossbred gilts were used in a 23 factorial experiment to study the effects of injecting 150 mg. of progesterone daily from day 2 through 13 and unilateral ovariectomy at day 2 on ovarian and pituitary activity at day 14 and at day 2 following the beginning of the next estrus. At day 14 progesterone injections blocked ovarian compensatory hypertrophy with very little effect on ovarian activity. Progesterone injections also increased residual FSH activity in the pituitary gland. Neither unilateral ovariectomy nor progesterone injections significantly affected average CL weight. By 2 days following the beginning of the next estrus. progesterone injections had resulted in.a lengthening of the estrous cycle, a higher residual LH activity in the pituitary gland and a higher proportion of animals with cystic follicles.


Footnotes

1 Paper No. 1155 from the Genetics Laboratory and No. 438 from the Department of Meat and Animal Science. Published with the approval of the Director of the Agricultural Experiment Station. This investigation was supported in part by The Ford Foundation, Grant No. 63–505, and by Public Health Service Training Grant No. 5 T01 HD00104-01, from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1968 by the American Society of Animal Science.