J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1968. 27:53-57.
© 1968 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brackelsberg, P. O.
Right arrow Articles by Willham, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brackelsberg, P. O.
Right arrow Articles by Willham, R. L.

Relationships among Some Common Live and Carcass Measurements and Beef Carcass Composition1, 2,

P. O. Brackelsberg3 and R. L. Willham3

Oklahoma State University, Stillwater

Abstract

Fifty-one Angus and Hereford cattle were evaluated alive and in the carcass to predict carcass muscle, fat trim and bone. Means and standard deviations were presented to describe the sample which was more uniform than many of the samples from which carcass prediction equations have been developed. The most valuable live measurement presented was the probe taken over the l. dorsi at the 12th rib. Simple correlations indicated that the live measurement of fat thickness was fully as accurate for predicting total carcass fat trim as was the conventional 12th rib fat thickness measurement taken in the carcass. A brief comparison was made between the cutability equations developed by Murphey et al. (1960a, 1960b) and Brungardt and Bray (1963). Multiple correlations were computed between certain combinations of live measurements, and these were compared with the multiple correlations obtained when certain sets of carcass measurements were used to predict carcass composition. Prediction equations are presented for some of these equations. In general, the sets of carcass measurements were more precise than were the live measurements for predicting carcass composition; however, the sacrifice in precision perhaps is not large enough to warrant a progeny or sib test for selection if the heritability of the trait is high.


Footnotes

1 This paper represents a portion of the senior author's thesis submitted to the Graduate School, Oklahoma State University, in patrial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.

2 The study was conducted in cooperation with the U.S.D.A., A.R.S. at the Fort Reno Livestock Station and is approved for publication by the director of the Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station as contribution No. 1498.

3 Present address: Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1968 by the American Society of Animal Science.