J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1968. 27:227-230.
© 1968 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hillier, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Beeson, W. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hillier, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Beeson, W. M.

Effect of Timed Interval Frequent Feeding of Predominantly Corn Silage Rations to Beef Steers1

R. J. Hillier, T. W. Perry, R. M. Peart2 and W. M. Beeson

Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana

Abstract

Eighty Hereford steer calves were used in two feeding trials (40 steers in each trial) and four steers in a reversal design metabolism trial to compare the effect of automatic frequent feeding (6 times per day) with hand feeding, twice daily, of predominantly corn silage diets to beef cattle. Although feeding trial I and the first phase of trial I were similar (growing ration), trial II also had a second phase in which calves received a finishing type ration.

In both feeding trials and on the two ratios of concentrate to roughage tested, no significant differences in the rate of gain were obtained between the two treatments. Although daily feed intake was not restricted, both treatments consumed practically the same amounts.

Results indicate no significant difference between the two treatments when comparing the digestibility of the various ration components.


Footnotes

1 Department of Animal Science Journal Paper No. 3080, Purdue University Agricultural Station. This research was supported in part by a grant and by equipment from the New Holland Machine Company, New Holland, Pennsylvania.

2 Department of Agricultural Engineering.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1968 by the American Society of Animal Science.