J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1968. 27:159-164.
© 1968 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heaney, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Pigden, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heaney, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Pigden, W. J.

Variability in Ad Libitum Forage Intakes by Sheep1, 2,

D. P. Heaney, G. I. Pritchard3 and W. J. Pigden

Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa

Abstract

Standard deviations (SD) and coefficients of variation (CV) were calculated from 441 determinations of ad libitum forage intake involving 2,427 individual animal/period measurements expressed as gm./W0.75 daily. The data include various species of grasses, legumes, grass-legume mixtures and straw; various physical forms: frozen, artificially dried, field cured, ensiled and pelleted; several environments: metabolism stalls, individual pens and group housed but tie-stall fed. Animal variability was high with an average SD of 9.7 and an average CV of 16.4%.

Forage Species. No marked between species variation occurred. SD ranged from 6.7 to 13.9 and CV from 14.9 to 19.1%.

Physical Form. SD were similar (7.1–9.7) for all forage types except pelleted (17.6). CV ranged from 10.5–16.4% except for silage (21.0%) and straw (23.8%).

Environment. SD for metabolism stalls (8.21) and slatted-floor individual pens (7.4) were lower than for bedded individual pens (11.1) and group housed but tie-stall fed (10.8). CV for metabolism stalls (11.5%) were lowest, individual bedded (16.2%) and slatted-floor (19.4%) pens intermediate and group housed but tie-stall fed (25.9%) highest.

Repeated assays on the same forage by the same animals did not reduce animal variability. The SD and CV were not consistent from period to period but appeared to fluctuate at random.

Estimates of the number of sheep required to give an 80% chance to detect intake differences at P=.O5 show that 10 to 15 sheep are required per forage to detect real differences of approximately 10 intake units.


Footnotes

1 Contribution No. 237, Animal Research Institute, Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, Canada.

2 Appreciation is expressed to H. B. Cannon, Statistical Research Service, for advice and assistance on the statistics; the Systems and Programming Section, Data Processing Service, for computer service in processing the data; the Biographic Unit, Scientific Information Section, for preparation of the illustration; and to J. C. Love for technical assistance in compiling the data.

3 Present address: Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1968 by the American Society of Animal Science.