|
|
||||||||
Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana
Abstract
Five fattening trials with steer calves and two growing trials, one with steer calves and the other with yearling heifers, were conducted to compare the supplemental value of predominantly urea supplements with those of natural protein. A 64% protein supplement containing either 21 or 22% urea (42.5%) was used in six of the trials, and an 80% (28% urea) and a 96% (35% urea) protein supplement were used in one comparison. A liquid supplement (64% protein) was compared in one experiment. The fattening rations contained a full feed of high moisture ground ear corn plus limited corn silage. The growing rations contained either corn stover silage or corn silage plus the supplements being compared. The urea supplements were compared against a 32% protein supplement in which the protein was derived from natural sources.
In four experiments, seven comparisons involving high energy rations, predominantly urea supplements gave growth results which were not significantly different from those obtained from the use of a 32% protein supplement of natural sources. However, in one fattening trial, cattle fed the natural proteins gained significantly (P<.01) faster than those fed high-urea supplements.
When a 64% protein, high-urea supplement was used in a growing ration with steer calves or with yearling heifers, such cattle gained significantly (steers, P<.01; heifers, P<.05) less than when natural proteins were used. A level of 14% molasses was equal to 28% molasses in the 64% protein formula, when added as a supplement to a fattening ration.
A liquid 64% high urea protein supplement (molasses, phosphoric acid, urea, minerals) was equivalent to a dry 64% high-urea protein supplement.
1 Department of Animal Sciences Journal Paper No. 3010, Purdue University Agricultural Experiment Station. Supported in part by a grant-in-aid from Phillips Petroleum Company, Bartlesville, Oklahoma.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |