J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1967. 26:820-826.
© 1967 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bohman, V. R.
Right arrow Articles by Lesperance, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bohman, V. R.
Right arrow Articles by Lesperance, A. L.

Methodology Research for Range Forage Evaluation1

V. R. Bohman and A. L. Lesperance

University of Nevada, Reno

Abstract

Range livestock nutrition involves the nutritional evaluation of a heterogenous plant cover which is modified continually by plant growth patterns and widely diverse environmental conditions. Plant analyses, animal growth and tissue composition indicates that energy, protein, phosphorus and vitamin A are the nutrients most apt to be deficient in the diet of grazing range livestock, although other deficienices, toxicities and metabolic malfunctions occur on a less extensive basis.

Techniques have been developed utilizing esophageal and ruminal fistulated animals as biological sampling agents. Although further refinements are indicated, these techniques represent the best methods for obtaining an unbiased sample of ingested forage. The preparation of a fistula sample for subsequent analyses is most critical because the apparent composition, especially the carbohydrate fraction, changes during subsequent drying.

The use of indicators to measure the digestibility and fecal excretion and, consequently, feed intake of grazing animals presents unique problems under range conditions because of animal management, environmental conditions and plant species. Although not completely solved, these problems do not seem to be insurmountable at this time. Selective grazing as measured by differences in botanical and chemical composition of the ingested forage compared to forage available is most pronounced.


Footnotes

1 Invited paper presented at the Pasture and Forage II Session, 58th Annual Meeting American Society of Animal Science, New Brunswick, New Jersey, July 31-Aug. 4, 1966. Contribution of the Nevada Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Series No. 59.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1967 by the American Society of Animal Science.