J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1967. 26:267-273.
© 1967 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Louca, A.
Right arrow Articles by Robison, O. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Louca, A.
Right arrow Articles by Robison, O. W.

Components of Variance and Covariance in Purebred and Crossbred Swine1

Avraam Louca and O. W. Robison

North Carolina State University, Raleigh

Abstract

Components of variance and covariance were estimated from records on 8039 purebred and crossbred pigs sired by 76 boars of the Duroc and Yorkshire breeds. The data were analyzed separately for each breeding system-sex subgroup. Traits studied were weight at birth and 154 days, litter size at birth, weaning and 154 days and backfat probe adjusted to 72.5 kg. bodyweight. Heritability values from paternal halfsib correlations were essentially zero for birth weight, and of moderate magnitude for backfat probe. Those for 154-day weight were 0.70, 0.81 and 0.65 for purebred boars, barrows and gilts, and 0.03 and 0.00 for crossbred barrows and gilts, respectively. A comparison of the components of variance in the two breeding groups led to the suggestion that nonadditive gene action was involved. Discussion on the effectiveness of selection concluded that selection on the basis of purebred performance would not be effective for improving crossbred performance and that selection for specific combining ability should provide a better means for utilizing heterosis experienced in crosses. Heritability estimates computed from daughter-dam regressions (245 pairs) were 0.05, 0.19 and 0.29 for litter size at birth, weaning and 154 days, respectively. Genetically, weight was negatively correlated with backfat probe, and litter size at weaning was positively correlated (0.99) with 154-day litter size. In general, the associations among the traits were of such magnitude and direction as to suggest that simultaneous improvement in all traits would be feasible.


Footnotes

1 Contribution from the Department of Animal Science. Published with the approval of the Director of Research, North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station, as paper No. 2229 of the Journal Series in cooperation with the Regional Swine Breeding Laboratory, AHRD, ARS, U. S. Department of Agriculture. The authors wish to acknowledge the cooperation of the personnel of the John Umstead and Dorothea Dix Hospitals and the N. C. Hospital Board of Control. The research was supported in part by a grant from the National Institutes of Health.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1967 by the American Society of Animal Science.