J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1967. 26:46-49.
© 1967 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gillett, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Merkel, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gillett, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Merkel, R. A.

Variation in Potassium and Sodium Content of Bovine Muscles1, 2, 3,

T. A. Gillett, A. M. Pearson, D. M. Allen and R. A. Merkel

Michigan State University, East Lansing

Abstract

Significant differences existed in the potassium and sodium concentration among various steer muscles on a wet basis, on a fat-free, moisture-free basis and on a protein basis. Variations as high as 12.91% occurred in the potassium concentration of muscles when means were compared. Variation in the potassium content of different muscles indicated that constancy does not exist in the potassium-muscle relationship, and therefore suggests that this may be an important source of error in the K40 method for estimating composition. Although breed differences occurred, the percent decrease was small and indicated that variation between breeds was of little consequence to the potassium-muscle relation-ship with the sample used in this study. A high degree of variation occurred among muscles in their sodium concentration, which suggests that the relationship of sodium to composition is even more inconsistent than the relationship for potassium. Data are also presented on the fat, protein and moisture content for the eight muscles studied.


Footnotes

1 Journal Article 3847, Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station, East Lansing.

2 The authors acknowledge the financial assistance of the Nutrition Foundation, Inc., 99 Park Ave., New York, N. Y., for providing a grant-in-aid for this study.

3 Departments of Food Science and Animal Husbandry.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1967 by the American Society of Animal Science.