J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J. Anim Sci. 1966. 25:65-67.
© 1966 American Society of Animal Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knobil, E.
Right arrow Articles by Goy, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Knobil, E.
Right arrow Articles by Goy, R. W.

Introduction to Discussion

Ernst Knobil

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

R. W. Goy

Oregon Regional Primate Research Center, Beaverton, Oregon

Abstract

E. Knobil: Dr. Harlow, your argument to the effect that males are different from females is completely convincing and very compelling indeed. As Dr. Nalbandov said, it is extremely difficult to follow Professor Harlow on the podium and I shan't try, largely because I have no personal experience, nor for that matter, very much knowledge about the subject under discussion. I wonder if Dr. Goy, who has already said much on the subject, would like to comment first on Professor Harlow's paper?

R. W. Goy: Most of the data that we have collected at Oregon have been completely confirmatory of the information Dr. Harlow has presented here. I think that the one basis of departure between the approaches in the two centers is in the emphasis given to the gonadal factors.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1966 by the American Society of Animal Science.