J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J. Anim Sci. 1966. 25:1148-1153.
© 1966 American Society of Animal Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Urban, W. E.
Right arrow Articles by Garwood, V. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Urban, W. E., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Garwood, V. A.

Genetic and Environmental Aspects of Litter Size in Swine

W. E. Urban, Jr.1, 2,, C. E. Shelby2, A. B. Chapman3, J. A. Whatley, Jr.4 and V. A. Garwood5

U. S. Department of Agriculture, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, and Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana

Abstract

Experiment station litter records from Indiana, Oklahoma and Wisconsin were utilized to study the effects of environment and heredity on the number of pigs born dead and alive, number living through the first day, number alive at weaning (56 days), total weight of the litter at weaning and number of pigs at 154 days. The 3,781 litters were born during the years 1944 to 1958 and averaged 9.26 total pigs at birth. A least-squares analysis was made to evaluate the effects of station (location), breed, farrowing history, year, season, inbreeding of both dam and litter and age of dam. The mean squares for most effects were significant for all traits. All observations were corrected for these environment and breed effects by using the least-squares constants, and all further computations were made from corrected data. Estimates of heritability were obtained from the regression of daughter on dam, the record of the dam being repeated for each daughter record. These estimates were 0.09±.04, 0.08±0.04, 0.13±.O5, 0.19±.05 and 0.10±.04, respectively, for the five traits. Estimates of repeatability were computed from a one-way analysis of variance (dams and litters within dams), and the standard errors of these estimates were computed by using the formula of Fisher (1958). Estimates of repeatability were 0.17±.03, 0.13±.03, 0.06±.03, 0.05±.03 and 0.07± .03. The curve of the daughter means against the record of the dam was not linear for total litter size at birth, the slope being negative up to a litter size of six. This was considered to be an uncorrectable maternal effect of litter size of the dam.

Footnotes

1 Present address: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of New Hampshire, Durham.

2 Regional Swine Breeding Laboratory, AHRD, ARS, with headquarters at Ames, Iowa.

3 Genetics Laboratory, University of Wisconsin, Madison,Paper No. 1070.

4 Associate Director, Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station, Stillwater.

5 Department of Animal Science, Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1966 by the American Society of Animal Science.