J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1966. 25:1040-1044.
© 1966 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kromann, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kromann, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, A. B.

Influence of Frequency and Source of Protein Supplementation on Energy Metabolism in Feeder Lambs1, 2,

R. P. Kromann, E. E. Ray and A. B. Nelson3

New Mexico State University, University Park,4

Abstract

A factorially-designed experiment using 80 crossbred lambs was used to study the growth response (weight gains), carcass data and NEM+P of the ration as influenced by source of protein, frequency of protein supplementation and sex. There was no significant difference between the protein sources (dehydrated alfalfa and cottonseed meal) in growth response or carcass data. Lambs fed the control rations (no protein supplement) gained significantly less than lambs fed protein supplement. There was no significant difference in weight gain and carcass data for lambs fed rations supplemented with protein at 1-, 7-, 14- or 21-day intervals. Wethers gained significantly more than ewe lambs and utilized the energy of the ration more efficiently. The rations supplemented with cottonseed meal had a greater NEM+P value than rations supplemented with dehydrated alfalfa; however, there were no significant differences due to frequency of protein supplementation.


Footnotes

1 Journal Article 250, Agricultural Experiment Station, New Mexico State University, University Park, New Mexico.

2 This investigation was partially supported by a grant from American Dehydrators Association and was conducted in cooperation with the Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Ft. Wingate, New Mexico.

3 The authors express their appreciation to Monte Mauldin and Ross Robinson for their valuable technical assistance.

4 Department of Animal Science.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1966 by the American Society of Animal Science.