J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1965. 24:986-989.
© 1965 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Niswender, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Zimmerman, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Niswender, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Zimmerman, D. R.

Alteration of Ovarian Activity in Cycling Beef Heifers with Small Daily Injections of Estradiol1, 2,

G. D. Niswender3, C. C. Kaltenbach3, R. P. Shumway4, J. N. Wiltbank5 and D. R. Zimmerman6

U. S. Department of Agriculture and University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Abstract

Daily injections of 20, 40, 80, 160, 320 or 640 mcg. of estradiol-17ß were administered to cycling beef heifers beginning on day 6 of the estrous cycle. Corpus luteum weight, progestin content, progestin concentration and follicular fluid weight at day 12 tended to be lower in the heifers injected with the higher levels of estrogen than in the control heifers. Similar estrogen treatment given daily from days 6 to 18 reduced luteal and follicular activity. Heifers receiving the higher levels of estradiol showed the greatest reduction.

There was no evidence obtained in this study to support the hypothesis that low levels of estrogen have a differential effect on the hypophysis of the heifer. In general, all levels of estrogen administered reduced all measures of ovarian activity taken and in no case was a stimulation of ovarian activity apparent.


Footnotes

1 Published with the approval of the Director as paper No.1669, Journal Series, Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station.

2 This investigation was supported in part by PHS research grant (A-5665) from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Public Health Service.

3 Present address: Department of Animal Science, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois.

4 Present address: Department of Animal Science, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.

5 Animal Husbandry Research Division, ARS, U.S.D.A., Fort Robinson Beef Cattle Research Station, Crawford, Nebraska,

6 Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1965 by the American Society of Animal Science.