J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1965. 24:951-954.
© 1965 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kornegay, E. T.
Right arrow Articles by Hoefer, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kornegay, E. T.
Right arrow Articles by Hoefer, J. A.

Influence of Dietary Urea on Performance, Antibody Production and Hematology of Growing Swine1, 2,

E. T. Kornegay3, E. R. Miller, D. E. Ullrey, B. H. Vincent and J. A. Hoefer

Michigan State University, East Lansing4

Abstract

Gain and hematological comparisons were made over a 69-day period among growing pigs receiving a 17% crude protein basal ration and pigs receiving 2.5% urea, either added to the basal making it 23% protein equivalent or replacing an equivalent amount of protein nitrogen in the basal ration. Inclusion of urea in the ration depressed rate and economy of gain during the 29- to 42-day period with subsequent improvement during the final 27 days of the experiment. The greatest initial gain depression and subsequent improvement were in the group in which urea replaced a portion of the basal protein. Pigs receiving urea had significantly increased serum urea and reduced serum ammonia concentrations at 32 days, but not at 69 days. Serum protein concentrations were significantly higher in males than in females. Rations had no effect on serum protein concentrations. Hematocrit, hemoglobin and leukocyte values were not different among treatments. Antibody response to Salmonella pullorum antigen was not affected by dietary urea. No symptoms of urea toxicity were noted.


Footnotes

1 Journal Article 3385, Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station, East Lansing.

2 This study was supported in part by a grant from the Rackham Foundation.

3 Present address: Department of Animal Sciences, Rutgers—The State University, New Brunswick, N. J.

4 Department of Animal Husbandry.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1965 by the American Society of Animal Science.