J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1965. 24:754-756.
© 1965 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jordan, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jordan, R. M.

Effect of Heat-Processed Flaked Corn on Growth of Lambs1

R. M. Jordan

University of Minnesota, St. Paul

Abstract

In three trials, the first of which involves six replications, the second two replications and the third three replications, the effect of feeding either shelled corn or heat-processed flaked corn in conjunction with hay was studied with growing lambs. Heat-processed flaked corn adversely affected grain consumption to some degree in all three trials. In the first trial grain consumption was sufficiently depressed during the entire trial to result in significantly slower gains. In the second trial lambs fed flaked corn required a considerably longer time to eat their grain, and the amount of shelled corn offered to the control lambs was limited to the amount of flaked corn that the other lambs would consume daily. This limitation of shelled corn consumption resulted in approximately equal weight gains. In the third trial lower consumption of flaked corn was a problem during the first 2 to 3 weeks. Average weight gain was essentially the same for lambs on both treatments. Efficiency of feed utilization in trials 2 and 3 was slightly higher with the flaked corn rations. However, this improvement in feed utilization accompanied by no increase in rate of gain is not of sufficient magnitude to compensate for the increased costs in ration preparation.


Footnotes

1 Paper No. 5559, Scientific Journal Series, Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station, St. Paul.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1965 by the American Society of Animal Science.