J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J. Anim Sci. 1965. 24:660-663.
© 1965 American Society of Animal Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ray, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by McCarty, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ray, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by McCarty, J. W.

Effect of Temporary Fasting on Reproduction in Gilts

D. E. Ray1 and J. W. McCarty

South Dakota Agricultural Experiment Station2, Brookings

Abstract

Two trials involving 122 gilts were conducted to evaluate the effect of temporary fasting on reproduction. Gilts were mated and assigned to one of the following treatments: 0 hr. off feed (controls), 24 hr. off feed, 48 hr. off feed, and 72 hr. off feed. Animals were slaughtered 25 to 33 days after mating and the numbers of corpora lutea and embryos were determined.

Ovulation rate was slightly lower in gilts from which feed was withheld, but the difference was not significant. Embryo survival rate was higher in fasted gilts than in controls in the winter trial. In the spring trial the difference was not significant.

These results suggest that the gilts were not actually subjected to stress conditions with respect to nutrition. Differences observed in the winter trial may have resulted because fasted gilts were temporarily subjected to less temperature stress immediately after breeding than were the control gilts which remained in outside pens.

All gilts were quite docile and inactive during the period off feed. None showed extreme hunger when allowed access to feed after fasting.

Footnotes

1 Present address: Department of Animal Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.

2 Department of Animal Science, published with the approval of the Director of the South Dakota Agricultural Experiment Station as Publication No. 660 of the Journal Series.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1965 by the American Society of Animal Science.