J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1965. 24:638-642.
© 1965 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crookshank, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kunkel, H. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crookshank, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kunkel, H. O.

Ovine Urinary Calculi and Pelleted Rations

H. R. Crookshank1, L. V. Packett, Jr.2, 3, and H. O. Kunkel4

U.S. Department of Agriculture and Texas A&M University, College Station

Abstract

Pelleting a mixed diet known to be calculogenic increased (P<.001) the calculogenicity of the diet when fed to wether lambs. In a single test a pelleted, noncalculogenic diet had no effect on the incidence of calculi or on feed consumption, but did increase gain and feed efficiency. Pelleting appeared to decrease feed consumption and gain of the calculogenic diet.

Lambs fed pelleted diets had an increased incidence of calculi, a decreased concentration of urinary magnesium and potassium and an increased level of urinary phosphorus excretion when compared to urine from lambs fed the corresponding diet in meal form. Where the incidence was the same of where no calculi were observed for both the pellet and meal forms of the diet, the mineral levels in the urine were essentially the same.


Footnotes

1 Beef Cattle Research Branch and Sheep and Fur Animal Research Branch, Animal Husbandry Research Division, ARS, College Station, Texas.

2 Present address: Department of Biochemistry, Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana.

3 A portion of the data was taken from a dissertation submitted to Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree.

4 Departments of Biochemistry and Nutrition and of Animal Husbandry, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, College Station, Texas.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1965 by the American Society of Animal Science.