J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1965. 24:448-453.
© 1965 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seerley, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Wahlstrom, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seerley, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Wahlstrom, R. C.

Dehydrated Alfalfa Meal in Rations for Confined Brood Sows1, 2,

R. W. Seerley and R. C. Wahlstrom

South Dakota State University, Brookings

Abstract

Two trials were conducted to evaluate dehydrated alfalfa meal in rations for sows. The sows were reared and kept in concrete-floored pens. In trial 1 levels of 0, 2.5, 5.0 and 10.0% alfalfa meal were compared. In trial 2 the same levels of alfalfa meal were used, and two levels of protein (14% and 18%) were compared.

A higher percent of sows fed the alfalfa-free or 2.5% alfalfa meal rations failed to farrow litters than sows fed 5 or 10% alfalfa meal in trial 1. Sows fed 10% alfalfa meal weaned significantly more pigs than those on the other three levels of alfalfa meal. Individual pigs in the 2.5% alfalfa group were heavier at weaning, but average litter weight was greatest for sows fed 10% alfalfa.

In trial 2 alfalfa meal and protein level did not affect significantly the number of sows farrowing, number of stillborn pigs, birth weight of the pigs or litter size and pig weight at weaning. Litter size at birth was improved by the higher level of protein in the alfalfa-free ration.


Footnotes

1 Department of Animal Science, published with the approval of the Director of the South Dakota Agricultural Experiment Station as Publication 652 of the Journal Series.

2 This research was partially supported by a grant from the American Dehydrators Association.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1965 by the American Society of Animal Science.