J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1965. 24:425-429.
© 1965 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dinkel, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Minyard, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dinkel, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Minyard, J. A.

Ratios and Percents as Measures of Carcass Traits1

C. A. Dinkel, L. L. Wilson, H. J. Tuma and J. A. Minyard2

South Dakota State University, Brookings

Abstract

Carcass data collected on 467 yearling Hereford steers over a 4-year period were used to study methods of carcass analysis with particular reference to linear adjustments for differences in weight. The results indicate that the use of ratios or percents involving weight as the denominator does little more than change the sign of the relationship between the trait and weight, and, therefore, will not be a satisfactory weight adjustment procedure. Treatment effects on carcass traits may actually be masked by the use of ratios or percents. Workers who think that percent is a trait rather than an adjustment procedure should consider whether percent is the best trait or the best method available to them for measuring the trait. Pounds of retail cuts adjusted for carcass weight by linear regression will reflect carcass composition; however, it has not been commonly used for this purpose. The application of these results is discussed in relation to the producing and carcass grading segments of the beef industry.


Footnotes

1 Department of Animal Science, published with the approval of the Director of the South Dakota Agricultural Experiment Station as Publication 631 of the Journal Series, in cooperation with the Agricultural Research Service, U.S.D.A. Contribution from Regional Project NC-1, Improvement of Beef Cattle through Breeding Methods. Partial support was received for the first 2 years of the study under contract No. 12-14-100-2631-44 with ARS, U.S.D.A.

2 The authors wish to express their appreciation to Jon Anderson for assistance in preparation of the figures and to D. K. Hallett, Standardization Branch, Livestock Division, AMS, U.S.D.A., for assistance in collecting carcass data.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. Rios-Utrera, L. V. Cundiff, K. E. Gregory, R. M. Koch, M. E. Dikeman, M. Koohmaraie, and L. D. Van Vleck
Effects of age, weight, and fat slaughter end points on estimates of breed and retained heterosis effects for carcass traits
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2006; 84(1): 63 - 87.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. Rios-Utrera, L. V. Cundiff, K. E. Gregory, R. M. Koch, M. E. Dikeman, M. Koohmaraie, and L. D. Van Vleck
Genetic analysis of carcass traits of steers adjusted to age, weight, or fat thickness slaughter endpoints
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2005; 83(4): 764 - 776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. R. Silva, M. J. Gomes, A. Dias-da-Silva, L. F. Gil, and J. M. T. Azevedo
Estimation in vivo of the body and carcass chemical composition of growing lambs by real-time ultrasonography
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2005; 83(2): 350 - 357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1965 by the American Society of Animal Science.