J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1965. 24:403-408.
© 1965 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ulberg, L. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ulberg, L. C.

Some Physiological Manifestations in the Bovine Estrous Cycle during Control with Exogenous Hormones1, 2,

A. Doyle Johnson and L. C. Ulberg

North Carolina State University, Raleigh

Abstract

A group of virgin dairy heifers were used to study the effects of injected progesterone, oral progesterone and oral progesterone followed by estrogen on cervical mucus viscosity and fern pattern formation, rectal temperature, ovarian activity and the occurrence of estrus. Occurrence of estrus and ovulation was inhibited during treatment. The other manifestations tended to follow the trends of the untreated estrous cycles at the time of estrus. Following this period the rectal temperature did not go as high and the cervical mucus scores did not go as low in treated as they did in untreated estrous cycles. As the time of post-treatment estrus approached, the cervical mucus scores failed to increase as rapidly and in most treatments did not reach the same level as during the control estrous period. Rectal temperature at post-treatment estrus also varied between treatments. Variations in physiological manifestations indicated failure of exogenous hormone treatments to completely control the reproduction system.


Footnotes

1 From the Department of Animal Science, North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station, Raleigh. Published with the approval of the Director of Research, as paper No. 1892 of the Journal Series.

2 Supported in part by a grant-in-aid from Eli Lilly and Co., Indianapolis, Indiana.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1965 by the American Society of Animal Science.