J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1965. 24:231-234.
© 1965 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McLaren, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Barth, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McLaren, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Barth, K. M.

Influence of Methionine and Tryptophan on Nitrogen Utilization by Lambs Fed High Levels of Non-Protein Nitrogen1

G. A. McLaren, G. C. Anderson and K. M. Barth2

West Virgina University, Morgantown

Abstract

Two digestion and nitrogen metabolism trials were conducted with grade wether lambs fed semi-purified rations composed of wheat straw, cane molasses and a concentrate mixture. The urea contained in the concentrate mixture was the sole source of supplemental nitrogen and accounted for 85% of the total nitrogen, which amounted to 1.6% of the ration.

Substitution of either 1.5 gm. of DL-methionine or 0.8 gm. of L-tryptophan for isonitrogenous amounts of urea nitrogen increased (P<.05) the retention of absorbed nitrogen above that of lambs fed the urea-basal ration. However, lambs fed rations containing both amino acids did not retain more absorbed nitrogen than lambs fed rations containing either one. The average increase in retention of absorbed nitrogen by lambs fed rations containing either or both amino acids was 15% above that of lambs fed the urea-basal ration. This increase in nitrogen retention was not related to the adaptation of the lambs to NPN utilization associated with time.

Supplementation of the urea-basal ration with either methionine or tryptophan did not influence the apparent digestibility of protein or the digestibility of organic matter and crude fiber.


Footnotes

1 Published with the approval of the Director of the West Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station as Scientific Paper No. 790 from the Animal Nutrition Section.

2 Present address: Department of Animal Science, Rutgers—The State University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1965 by the American Society of Animal Science.