J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1965. 24:203-208.
© 1965 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rippel, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Becker, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rippel, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Becker, D. E.

Effect of Level and Source of Protein on Reproductive Performance of Swine

R. H. Rippel1, O. G. Rasmussen2, A. H. Jensen, H. W. Norton and D. E. Becker

Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station, Urbana

Abstract

A study of 155 animals was made to evaluate the influence of various levels and sources of protein fed during the last half of pregnancy on reproductive performance of female swine.

Neither the level nor the source of protein influenced litter size, number of live pigs farrowed, birth weight of live pigs or pig livability. Gilt, but not sow, gestation gain was inferior at 5% protein compared to gain at 16% protein. Litter weight at 2 weeks post-partum was satisfactory when the sows were fed a 16% protein diet during gestation and lactation. Litters from gilts fed 5% protein during gestation and 16% protein during lactation gained faster than litters from gilts fed 5% protein diets during both phases.

A 97% corn diet supported parturition performance equivalent to that of a 16% protein, corn-soybean meal diet. However, the corn diet did not support gestation gain during the winter months or litter gain the first 2 weeks of lactation equal to that of gilts fed 16% protein.


Footnotes

1 Present address: Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, Illinois.

2 Present address: Armour and Company, Grocery Products Division, Bellwood, Illinois.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
D. H. Baker
Animal Models in Nutrition Research
J. Nutr., February 1, 2008; 138(2): 391 - 396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1965 by the American Society of Animal Science.