HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Barnes, R. F. Articles by Plumlee, M. P. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Barnes, R. F. Articles by Plumlee, M. P.

Comparison of In Vitro Rumen Fermentation Methods¹

U. S. Department of Agriculture, and Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana

Abstract

An intra-laboratory comparison of different in vitro rumen fermentation methods for measuring rate of cellulose digestion was made. The study consisted of two experiments ; the first involved four in vitro methods and three substrates (alfalfa hay, alfalfa meal and bromegrass hay) fermented over four time periods (6-, 12-, 18- and 24-hr.).

Cellulose digestibilities for the in vitro methods could be categorized into two groups, with differences between groups but not within groups. Differences were found between fermentation periods, and an interaction between periods and methods occurred. This interaction was primarily the result of changing rates of cellulose digestion between time periods. Differences were found between bromegrass hay and alfalfa substrates but not between the two alfalfa samples.

The second experiment involved three in vitro methods utilizing an alfalfa meal substrate studied over five fermentation periods (6-, 12-, 18-, 24- and 48-hr.). Differences between methods were obtained after 6- and 12-hr. fermentation periods but not after 18-, 24-, and 48-hr. periods.

The primary factors which could have contributed to differences between methods were size of substrate, nutrient media, preparation of inoculum, maintenance of anaerobiosis and type of fermentation vessel. The variability between duplicate samples decreased as the length of the fermentation period increased. Differences also existed between methods in the magnitude of the within-trial variability.

¹ Journal Paper No. 2288, Purdue University Agricultural Experiment Station.

² Research Agronomist, Crops Research Division, ARS, U.S.D.A., and Assistant Professor of Agronomy; Professor of Agronomy; Associate Professor of Biochemistry: and Professor of Animal Science, respectively, Purdue University Agricultural Experiment Station.