J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1964. 23:711-716.
© 1964 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brinks, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Urick, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brinks, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Urick, J. J.

Estimates of Genetic, Environmental and Phenotypic Parameters in Range Hereford Females1

J. S. Brinks2, R. T. Clark2, N. M. Kieffer3 and J. J. Urick3

U. S. Department of Agriculture and Montana Agricultural Experiment Station

Abstract

Data collected on Hereford females at the United States Range Livestock Experiment Station, Miles City, Montana, from 1934 through 1959 were used to obtain heritability estimates and genetic, environmental, and phenotypic correlations among weights, gains, and scores from birth through mature weight. These estimates were used to predict expected change from direct and correlated responses from single trait selection. Heritability estimates obtained from paternal half-sib analyses were birth weight, 0.38; gain from birth to weaning, 0.40; 180-day weaning weight, 0.43; weaning score, 0.28; gain from weaning to 12 months, 0.45; 12-month weight, 0.41; gain from 12 to 18 months, 0.35; 18-month weight, 0.50; 18-month score, 0.13; mature spring weight, 0.52; and mature fall weight, 0.57. Genetic correlations among all weights and gains were fairly high, 0.40 to 0.99, except for those involving gain during the first winter from weaning to 12 months. Selection for 18-month weight appears to be a good single criterion for selection for growth throughout life.


Footnotes

1 This study was conducted under Western Regional Project W-1, The Improvement of Beef Cattle through the Application of Breeding Methods, at the U. S. Range Livestock Experiment Station, Miles City, Montana, in cooperation with the Montana Agricultural Experiment Station, Bozeman, Montana.

2 Beef Cattle Research Branch, Animal Husbandry Research Division, ARS, Denver, Colorado.

3 Beef Cattle Research Branch, Animal Husbandry Research Division, ARS, U. S. Range Livestock Experiment Station, Miles City, Montana.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. A. Arango, L. V. Cundiff, and L. D. Van Vleck
Genetic parameters for weight, weight adjusted for body condition score, height, and body condition score in beef cows
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2002; 80(12): 3112 - 3122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
Y. H. Choy, J. S. Brinks, and R. M. Bourdon
Repeated-measure animal models to estimate genetic components of mature weight, hip height, and body condition score
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2002; 80(8): 2071 - 2077.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1964 by the American Society of Animal Science.