J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1964. 23:665-668.
© 1964 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Franks, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brown, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Franks, L.

Factors Affecting Size of Young Beef Cows1,2,

C. J. Brown and Larry Franks

University of Arkansas, Fayetteville

Abstract

Analysis by least squares procedures provided estimates of the effects of date of measurement, breed, age and reproductive status on weight and eight body measurements of beef cows at 3 years of age. The body measurements studied were height at withers, height at hips, width at shoulders, width at hips, depth at chest, depth at rear flank, heart girth and body length. No trend associated with date of measurement was noted. Differences between breeds in weight and dimensions were small. Dry cows were about 100 lb. heavier than wet cows with greater dimensions in those measurements influenced by fatness. No consistent increase in weight or dimensions was associated with age over the range studied. Heritability estimates were 0.44 for weight, 0.41 for wither height, 0.69 for hip height, 0.40 for shoulder width, 0.11 for hip width, 0.71 for chest depth, 0.39 for rear flank depth, 0.46 for heart girth and 0.48 for body length.


Footnotes

1 Published with the approval of the Director of the Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station.

2 A publication of Southern Regional Beef Cattle Breeding Project, S-10.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. A. Arango, L. V. Cundiff, and L. D. Van Vleck
Comparisons of Angus, Charolais, Galloway, Hereford, Longhorn, Nellore, Piedmontese, Salers, and Shorthorn breeds for weight, weight adjusted for condition score, height, and condition score of cows
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2004; 82(1): 74 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. A. Arango, L. V. Cundiff, and L. D. Van Vleck
Genetic parameters for weight, weight adjusted for body condition score, height, and body condition score in beef cows
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2002; 80(12): 3112 - 3122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. A. Arango, L. V. Cundiff, and L. D. Van Vleck
Breed comparisons of Angus, Charolais, Hereford, Jersey, Limousin, Simmental, and South Devon for weight, weight adjusted for body condition score, height, and body condition score of cows
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2002; 80(12): 3123 - 3132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
Y. H. Choy, J. S. Brinks, and R. M. Bourdon
Repeated-measure animal models to estimate genetic components of mature weight, hip height, and body condition score
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2002; 80(8): 2071 - 2077.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1964 by the American Society of Animal Science.