J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1964. 23:638-644.
© 1964 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davis, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Carmon, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Davis, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Carmon, J. L.

Use of Ultrasonics and Visual Appraisal to Estimate Total Muscling in Beef Cattle

J. K. Davis1, R. A. Long, R. L. Saffle2, E. P. Warren and J. L. Carmon

University of Georgia, Athens3

Abstract

A Branson Sonoray instrument was used on 60 Hereford steers to estimate the cross-sectional area of the l. dorsi muscle. A detailed study was conducted on 10 of these steers, utilizing the same technique to evaluate other portions of the body in relation to carcass merit.

Ultrasonic estimates of the loin-eye area and fat thickness were highly correlated with the corresponding carcass measurements (r=0.87 and 0.90, respectively). Ultrasonic estimates of the lumbar loin-eye area were highly correlated (r=0.82) with the corresponding carcass measurements. A definite variation in depth of l. dorsi muscle was revealed from the lateral estimates made by the Sonoray. Ultrasonic estimates of the biceps femoris thickness and forearm thickness were positively but non-significantly correlated with actual carcass measurements. Results of this portion of the study indicate that ultrasonics offer much promise as an objective tool for animal evaluation.

Data from the visual appraisal study show that one of the three livestock judges successfully grouped steers by ranking them into light, medium or heavy muscling categories using adjusted loin-eye area as a basis for muscling. The F-test showed no significant difference between graders due to the limited data.


Footnotes

1 A portion of a thesis submitted to the graduate faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science.

2 Food Technology Department.

3 Animal Husbandry Department, Journal Article No. 308 of the College Experiment Station, Georgia Agricultural Experiment Stations, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1964 by the American Society of Animal Science.