J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1963. 22:679-685.
© 1963 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jordan, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hanke, H. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jordan, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hanke, H. E.

Frequency of Feeding, Roughage-Concentrate Ratio for Pregnant Ewes and Summer Drylot Feeding of Non-Lactating Ewes

R. M. Jordan and H. E. Hanke1

University of Minnesota, St. Paul

Abstract

Three separate experiments involving a total of 358 ewes were conducted to determine the effect on production costs and ewe productivity of: (1) frequency of feeding, (2) high grain low-roughage rations for pregnant ewes and (3) body weight losses of ewes during the summer non-lactating period.

Frequency of feeding (three times per week) had no significant effect on ewe weight gains, fleece weights, lambing percent, lamb birth weights and 30-day lamb weights.

Gestating ewes fed rations consisting of either equal parts of corn and hay or three parts corn and one part hay in amounts 50% as great (in lb.) as ewes fed a conventional hay ration gained as much weight and were comparable in wool and lamb production with ewes fed conventional hay rations. A three-part corn—one-part hay ration when fed at calculated TDN levels equal to a conventional hay ration resulted in significantly greater weight gains but did not affect wool or lamb production. In one trial ewes were fed a ground ear corn-soybean meal ration with no supplemental hay. Weight gains, lamb production and fleece weights were not significantly affected by treatments. Ewes maintained on the low hay rations exhibited a craving for roughage. It was concluded, however, that when TDN can be purchased or produced cheaper with grains than forages that rather high proportions of grain can be included in pregnant ewe rations.

Feeding non-lactating ewes during the summer alfalfa-brome hay at levels which permit them to lose 10 or 5% of their body weight, to maintain their body weight, or to increase body weight 10% had no significant effect on conception, fleece production or lambing percent. About the same amount of TDN was required to increase the weight of non-lactating ewes 10% (0.06–0.08 lb. daily) as is required for gestating ewes. About 1.0 and 1.1 lb. TDN per 100 lb. body weight was required to maintain body weight. Ewes fed to lose about 10% of their body weight consumed about 60% as much TDN as ewes that maintained their body weight. The low level of energy supplied these ewes resulted in an appreciable saving in feed without adversely affecting their production of wool and lambs.


Footnotes

1 Paper No. 5043 Scientific Journal Series of the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1963 by the American Society of Animal Science.