J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1963. 22:617-623.
© 1963 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bradford, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Weir, W. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bradford, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Weir, W. C.

Performance and Variability of Offspring of Crossbred and Purebred Rams

G. E. Bradford1, D. T. Torell2, G. M. Spurlock1 and W. C. Weir1,3,

University of California, Davis

Abstract

Hampshire, Suffolk and Hampshire-Suffolk crossbred rams from comparable parents were tested in topcross tests on commercial ewes in the Hopland Field Station flock and in four cooperator flocks. A total of twelve rams and approximately 270 ewes for each of the three groups were included in these tests.

No consistent differences among the three sire groups in lambing percent or lambing date were found. No undue lambing difficulty was noted in any case.

Crossbred-sired lambs showed an advantage of approximately 4% in lamb survival over the two-parent breed groups, which were similar when averaged over all trials.

Crossbred-sired lambs were intermediate between the two parent breed groups in birth weight and 120-day weight, though they approached the heavier breed mean in the latter. Crossbred-sired lambs had higher live grades than the Hampshire and Suffolk average in the Hopland flock, but not in the other trials. Carcass data supported the conclusion that crossbred-sired lambs carried more finish at weaning in the Hopland flock.


Footnotes

1 Department of Animal Husbandry, Davis.

2 Department of Animal Husbandry, Hopland.

3 The authors wish to express their appreciation to the ranchers: A. M. Alvares, Red Bluff; Roscoe Brothers, Petrolia; Floyd Farley, Merced and Elliott Redd, Kelseyville; to the Farm Advisors: L. V. Maxwell, J. Dunbar, D. A. Petersen and W. C. Lusk, and to the Extension Livestock Specialists, R. Albaugh and H. Strong, for their assistance with the field trials; to Richard Rainaldi, Hopland Field Station shepherd; and to Mrs. A. L. Vincent, for assistance with analysis of the data.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1963 by the American Society of Animal Science.