J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1963. 22:177-182.
© 1963 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brungardt, V. H.
Right arrow Articles by Bray, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brungardt, V. H.
Right arrow Articles by Bray, R. W.

Estimate of Retail Yield of the Four Major Cuts in the Beef Carcass1

V. H. Brungardt and R. W. Bray2

University of Wisconsin,,3 Madison

Abstract

Linear measurements of muscle and fat, yields of untrimmed and trimmed wholesale cuts and trimmed retail cuts were obtained from a total of 99 left-sides of U. S. choice steer carcasses representing three weight groups.

The yield of the four major wholesale cuts varied only slightly between weight groups, whereas the percent of trimmed wholesale cuts and retail cuts showed a highly significant difference among the weight groups. Percent trimmed round made the largest contribution to the multiple correlation coefficient in predicting percent retail yield. The area of the longissimus dorsi, when used in the regression equation with a single 12th rib fat measurement, percent kidney knob, and left-side weight made a significant improvement in the precision of the estimate. All of the fat measurements studied had highly significant simple correlations with percent retail yield. Two measurements, percent trimmed round and a single 12th rib fat measurement, accounted for 81% of the variation in percent retail cut yield.


Footnotes

1 Published with the approval of the Director of the Wisconsin Experiment Station.

2 The authors express their appreciation to Oscar Mayer and Company for furnishing the carcasses used in this project. The authors also acknowledge support by a research grant from the American Hereford Association.

3 Department of Meat and Animal Science, Paper No. 356.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
T. E. Lawrence, R. L. Farrow, B. L. Zollinger, and K. S. Spivey
Technical note: The United States Department of Agriculture beef yield grade equation requires modification to reflect the current longissimus muscle area to hot carcass weight relationship
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2008; 86(6): 1434 - 1438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. P. Greiner, G. H. Rouse, D. E. Wilson, L. V. Cundiff, and T. L. Wheeler
Prediction of retail product weight and percentage using ultrasound and carcass measurements in beef cattle
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2003; 81(7): 1736 - 1742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. P. Greiner, G. H. Rouse, D. E. Wilson, L. V. Cundiff, and T. L. Wheeler
Accuracy of predicting weight and percentage of beef carcass retail product using ultrasound and live animal measures
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2003; 81(2): 466 - 473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1963 by the American Society of Animal Science.