J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1963. 22:169-172.
© 1963 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harrington, G.
Right arrow Articles by Magee, W. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Harrington, G.
Right arrow Articles by Magee, W. T.

Subjective Evaluations of Cutting Yields and Rib-Eye Area in Live Hogs and Carcasses1

G. Harrington2

Agricultural Research Council Statistics Group, School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge, England

A. M. Pearson and W. T. Magee3

Michigan State University, East Lansing

Abstract

Studies of the ability of panels of judges to differentiate between live hogs and their carcasses for economically important characteristics have been made using a paired comparison technique. Judges of live hogs tended to be more consistent in their judgements than did those of carcasses and to achieve a perfect ranking of the seven hogs comprising each batch more nearly, although the carcass judges showed a marked improvement as the experiment progressed.

Both panels of judges found it more difficult to make consistent judgements of the percent yield of untrimmed loin than of rib-eye area or of the yield of trimmed lean cuts. Rankings of live hogs for the yield of untrimmed loin showed very little relation to the actual yield of this cut, and only a slight relation for the carcass judges. Rankings of live hogs and carcasses for rib-eye area and the yield of trimmed lean cuts were both significantly related to these characteristics although, in the case of lean cut yield, the judges' predictions were no better than could have been achieved using backfat measurements.


Footnotes

1 Journal Article 3062, Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station, East Lansing.

2 Acknowledgement is made to the W. K. Kellogg Foundation, Battle Creek, Michigan, for supporting this research by supplying a fellowship to G. Harrington and for furnishing other financial assistance for carrying out this study.

3 Departments of Food Science and Animal Husbandry.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1963 by the American Society of Animal Science.