J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1962. 21:955-959.
© 1962 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bowman, G. H.
Right arrow Articles by Walters, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bowman, G. H.
Right arrow Articles by Walters, L. E.

Physical Indices of Leanness in Swine

G. H. Bowman1, J. A. Whatley, Jr. and L. E. Walters

Oklahoma State University, Stillwater2

Abstract

An analysis of the measurements of 42 barrow carcasses of similar breeding indicated that carcass length was of little value as an index of percent separable lean (r2=0.06), and was of no value if carcass backfat was also considered. The leanmeter better indicated leanness (r2=0.48) than did carcass backfat thickness (r2=0.36), but was inferior to carcass backfat thickness and loin-eye area at the tenth rib (R2=0.70). Specific gravity of the ham was a good index of leanness (r2=0.69) and mutually supplemented loin-eye area (R2=0.79). The weights of lean and fat in the ham were highly associated with leanness (R2=0.92). The locations of eight cross sections and the abilities of their area components of fat and lean to explain variance in percent lean were the second thoracic vertebra, R2=0.79; the sixth thoracic vertebra, R2=0.81; the tenth thoracic vertebra, R2=0.85; the fourteenth thoracic vertebra R2=0.77; the third lumbar vertebra, R2=0.89, the second sacral vertebra, R2=0.77; the center of the ham R2=0.81; and the shank of the ham, R2=0.72. The indices generally showed a lower relation with weight of separable lean than with percent of separable lean. They were associated, however, more closely with leanness than with the protein of the lean.


Footnotes

1 Present address, Research Branch, Lacombe, Alberta, Canada.

2 Department of Animal Husbandry in co-operation with the Regional Swine Breeding Laboratory, AHRD, ARS, U.S.D.A.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1962 by the American Society of Animal Science.