J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1962. 21:844-847.
© 1962 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richards, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, H. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Richards, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, H. G.

Date of Cut vs. the Combination of Crude Fiber and Crude Protein as Estimators of Forage Quality1,2,

C. R. Richards3, G. F. W. Haenlein, M. C. Calhoun4, J. D. Connolly5 and H. G. Weaver6,7,

University of Delaware, Newark

Abstract

The relationship of the dates-of-cut of 22 alfalfa and grass hays grown in Delaware with their digestibilities by sheep were calculated to be represented by the regression equations: Y=73.24–.24X±4.18 All hays Y=75.4 7–.30X±3.36 Harvested prior to June 19 Y=percent dry matter digestibility and X= number of days after April 15. The correlation coefficients were r=–.68 and r=–.74, respectively. Relationships were compared for forage quality estimations made by the date-of-cut equation for New York State: Y=85.0–.48X X=number of days after April 10 (Reid et al., 1959) and estimations of TDN content by the equation:
Figure 1
Y=percent TDN content, X1=percent digestible protein, and X2=percent crude fiber (Axlesson, 1952); percent digestible protein =0.946 times crude protein –3.52 (Holter and Reid, 1959). Both methods estimated dry matter digestibilities of the Delaware forages fairly well. The differences from the observed digestibility of dry matter with hays harvested within 70 days of April 10 averaged –.1±0.9 and –1.7±0.9 for the two methods, respectively. With the hays used in this study there was no advantage in accuracy of determination of one method over the other. Ease, speed and practicability of determination seem to favor the method of date-of-cut for evaluating quality of forages cut during 70 days after April 10. The knowledge of daily decrease of 0.3 percentage units in dry matter digestibility of first cutting hays will be of practical value in farm extension programs.


Footnotes

1 Department of Animal and Poultry Science. Published as miscellaneous paper No. 412 with the approval of the Director, Delaware Agricultural Experiment Station.

2 Supported in part from regional funds as a part of Delaware's contributing project to NE-24, the Nutritive Evaluation of Forages.

3 Present address: CSESS, USDA, Washington 25, D. C.

4 Present address: Animal Industries Dept., U. of Connecticut, Storrs.

5 Present address: Dairy Dept., U. of Maryland, College Park.

6 Present address: Allegheny Valley Hospital, Natrona Heights, Penna.

7 The authors wish to acknowledge the assistance of the following in various phases of this work: R. D. Dempsey, J. L. Fleeger, W. H. Mitchell, C. E. Phillips, W. E. Larson, R. M. Somers, J. R. Stritzinger and C. D. Passmore.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1962 by the American Society of Animal Science.