J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1962. 21:511-515.
© 1962 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hiner, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Thornton, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hiner, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Thornton, J. W.

Study of Certain Lamb and Carcass Quality Factors

Richard L. Hiner and John W. Thornton

United States Department of Agriculture1, 2,

Abstract

Data on 1138 lambs (adjusted for breed of sire, breed of dam, sire, birth-year and sex) were used to determine if trimmed primal cuts could be accurately predicted from combinations of carcass factors or slaughter weight.

Body width was the most reliable carcass measurement studied. Carcass weight and body width were the two most reliable carcass factors studied. Seasonal fluctuations, varying feed conditions and characteristically fatter females than males attributed to significantly larger variances in yields for birth-year and sex when slaughter rather than carcass weight was included as a partial regression. Inclusion of head, bone and viscera weights in live weight caused larger variances in yields when slaughter rather than carcass weight was used as a partial regression. This study indicates that yields of primal cuts can be predicted rather accurately both in the live animal and from either body width or carcass weight which do not involve cutting up the carcass. Consequently, these results may be of practical importance both to the producer and the packer.


Footnotes

1 Meat Quality Laboratory, Animal Husbandry Research Division, ARS, Beltsville, Maryland.

2 The authors are indebted to the Computing Laboratory and Livestock Staff of Biometrical Services, ARS, USDA, Beltsville, Maryland, for their assistance.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1962 by the American Society of Animal Science.