J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1962. 21:340-345.
© 1962 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Keuren, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Heinemann, W. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Van Keuren, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Heinemann, W. W.

Study of a Nylon Bag Technique for In Vivo Estimation of Forage Digestibility1

R. W. Van Keuren and W. W. Heinemann2

Washington Agriculture Experiment Stations

Abstract

A nylon-bag technique for in vivo estimation of forage dry matter digestibility is described. A uniformity trial with an alfalfa hay indicated very good repeatability with this procedure.

An increase in percent dry matter digestibility of orchardgrass and sudangrass was found with each 24-hr, increase in length of time that the material remained in the rumen. Alfalfa and Ladino clover had a much higher digestibility for the first 24-hr. period than the grasses. Digestibility of alfalfa increased slightly through the 48- and 72-hr. periods. Digestibility of Ladino clover tended to level-off after the 48-hr. period.

Fineness of grind of the samples did not affect percent digestibility. Generally, larger sample size resulted in lower digestibility for comparable periods of time in the rumen. These differences tended to disappear as length of time in the rumen increased.

The dietary regimen of the fistulated animal appeared to influence digestibility of the forage samples.


Footnotes

1 Scientific Paper No. 2091, Washington Agricultural Experiment Stations Project 1550.

2 Associate Agronomist and Animal Scientist, respectively, Irrigation Experiment Station, Prosser, Washington. The authors wish to acknowledge the suggestions of T. S. Russell, Station Statistician; I. A. Dyer, Animal Scientist; T. H. Blosser, Dairy Scientist; and B. E. Conrad, formerly Research Assistant in Agronomy, Washington State University, Pullman.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1962 by the American Society of Animal Science.