J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1962. 21:200-206.
© 1962 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rollins, W. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kudoda, M. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rollins, W. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kudoda, M. N.

Beef Cattle Performance and Progeny Tests for Gain, Efficiency, Carcass Conformation and Earliness of Maturity1, 2,

W. C. Rollins, F. D. Carroll, J. W. T. Pollock and M. N. Kudoda3

University of California, Davis

Abstract

THE performance and progency test reported in this study were undertaken to evaluate various peformance criteria for selecting bulls, especially the selection of bulls on the basis of postweaning growth made on a low concentrate, high roughage ration.

Materials and Methods

From 1953 through 1960 all bulls in the U.C. inbred Hereford line were performance tested. No bull calves were castrated. All bulls of a calf crop were tested concurrently under similar conditions.

To each of 12 cooperating cattleman a pair of concurrently tested bulls was loaned for breeding. Their steers calves, usually 10 per bull were aquired by the University at weaning time for testing at Davis, California.

In choosing a pair of bulls for a cooperator an effort was made to have a large difference as possible between the members of a pair in their rates of gain while on a fattening ration. The desire to have the bulls of a pair as close to the same age as possible and the reluctance of cooperators to take a bull grading two minus or less on the University of California confirmation scale (Rollins and Wagon, 1956) restricted the size of the selection differential just describe.


Footnotes

1 In cooperation with the U.S.D.A. under Western regional project W-1 on beef cattle breeding research.

2 Acknowledgement is made to those members of the University of California Agricultural Extension Service, to those commercial cattlemen and to Bill Stansfield. Technician, who assisted in this study.

3 Department of Animal Husbandry.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1962 by the American Society of Animal Science.