J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1962. 21:193-195.
© 1962 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ramsey, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hobbs, C. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ramsey, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hobbs, C. S.

Relation of Beef Carcass Grades, Proposed Yield Grades and Fat Thickness to Separable Lean, Fat and Bone1

C. B. Ramsey, J. W. Cole and C. S. Hobbs

Tennessee Agriculture Experiment Station, Knoxville

Abstract

The relationships of carcass grade, yield grade and fat thickness with percent separable lean, fat and bone were compared using data from 133 steers representing eight breeds. Carcass grade and yield grade were negatively associated with separable lean and bone but positively associated with separable fat. Yield grades calculated to the nearest 0.05 were more closely related to separable lean and fat than were yield grades calculated to the whole number only. When rib-eye area was omitted from yield grade calculations, the resulting yield grades were more highly related to separable lean and fat than when rib-eye area was included. These data indicate that fat has a more definite influence on percent separable lean than does rib-eye area. Neither carcass grade nor yield grade was superior to a single fat thickness measurement or an average of three fat thickness measurements over the rib eye as an estimator of percent separable lean and fat. Furthermore, there was no advantage in using an average of three fat thickness measurements instead of a single measurement. When calculated on a within breed basis, all coefficients were lowered, indicating less variation within breeds than in the pooled sample.


Footnotes

1 Published with the approval of the Director of Tennessee Agricultural Experiment Station, Knoxville.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1962 by the American Society of Animal Science.