J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J. Anim Sci. 1962. 21:123-126.
© 1962 American Society of Animal Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mellin, T. N.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mellin, T. N.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, M. J.

Nutritive Value of Timothy Hay as Affected by Date of Harvest1,2,

T. N. Mellin3, B. R. Poulton and M. J. Anderson4

Maine Agricultural Experiment Station, Orono

Abstract

A relatively pure stand of first-growth Climax timothy was divided into 11 plots and harvested at 11 stages of maturity beginning on May 27, and at 7-day intervals until August 5. Protein content and protein digestibility both decreased sharply with each delay in harvest until July 22 when values seemed to level off and remained fairly constant, probably due to the effects of bottom regrowth of the forage stand and possibly to seed formation. The digestibility of the energy in these forages decreased markedly as they matured. Coefficients of dry matter digestibility decreased sharply and constantly with each delay in harvest, and a linear relationship was established between dry matter digestibility (Y) and days elapsing after May 17 (X) in the equation, Y=84.91—0.481 X. The results of this study indicate that date of harvest can be used as a basis for predicting nutritive value (expressed as digestible dry matter), and that it is probably the single most important determinant of forage nutritive value.

Footnotes

1 This study was a part of a Northeast Regional Project (NE-24 Forage Evaluation); a cooperative study involving agricultural experiment stations in the Northeast region and supported in part by regional funds.

2 This study was financed in part by the generous support from the Charles H. Hood Foundation and the American Cyanamid Company.

3 Present address: Washington State University.

4 Present address: Utah State University.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1962 by the American Society of Animal Science.