J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1961. 20:751-758.
© 1961 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Horn, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kassir, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Van Horn, H. H., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Kassir, S. M.

Further Observations on the Prevention of Pasture Bloat by the Use of Antibiotics in Rotation or in Combination1

H. H. Van Horn, Jr., P. A. Hartman, N. L. Jacobson, A. D. McGilliard, P. R. Shellenberger and S. M. Kassir

Iowa State University, Ames

Abstract

A rotation of antibiotics was fed sequentially in grain, each antibiotic being fed for a 1-week period. The rotation, consisting of penicillin (P), erythromycin (E), tylosin (T), chloramphenicol (C), oxytetracycline (O) and streptomycin (S), prevented serious bloat during the initial 6-week period. Two subsequent repetitions of the cycle indicated that penicillin regained effectiveness in the least time (about 6 weeks). The most effective treatment over a prolonged period was a combination of P, E, T, C and O fed in grain, which provided protection over the entire period (May to Sept.) in which it was fed. A water-administered combination of P, E and T prevented bloat for about 7 weeks. A weekly rotation of P, E and T seemed to be effective when given in the drinking water, but the water-administration of C which followed was ineffective, probably due to its poor solubility and low water stability. The average weight gains of the groups receiving antibiotics in rotation and in combination were much greater than those of control animals.


Footnotes

1 Journal Paper No. J-4109 of the Iowa Agricultural and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, Iowa. Project No. 1267. Supported in part by funds provided by Regional Project NC-27.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1961 by the American Society of Animal Science.