J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1961. 20:597-602.
© 1961 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kornegay, E. T.
Right arrow Articles by Barrick, E. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kornegay, E. T.
Right arrow Articles by Barrick, E. R.

Influence of Protein Source on Toxicity of Gossypol in Swine Rations1

E. T. Kornegay2, A. J. Clawson, F. H. Smith and E. R. Barrick3

North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station, Raleigh

Abstract

The results of an investigation to determine the effect of protein source on toxicity of gossypol in swine rations are presented. Peanut and soybean meal were used as the sources of supplemental protein in Experiment I and cottonseed and soybean meal in Experiment II. Cottonseed meats were added to the rations containing each source of protein to obtain graded levels of free gossypol. Six pigs were individually fed each ration.

The toxicity of free gossypol, as measured by feed intake, gain and mortality of swine was influenced by both the source of protein and the level of free gossypol. There was a significant (P<0.05) protein-source x level-of-free-gossypol interaction associated with feed consumption and daily gain. Soybean meal rations gave superior performance to peanut or cottonseed meal rations at all levels of free gossypol.

Efficiency of feed utilization was not significantly affected by gossypol addition to the ration. The mortality rate was lower for pigs fed soybean meal rations than for pigs fed peanut or cottonseed meal rations.


Footnotes

1 Approved for publication as Paper No. 1271 in the Journal Series of North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station.

2 This material is based upon part of a thesis submitted by the senior author in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the M.S. degree at North Carolina State College. Present address: Department of Animal Husbandry, Michigan State University, East Lansing.

3 The authors acknowledge the assistance of the National Cottonseed Products Association, Inc., Dallas, Texas for grants-in-aid and U. S. Department of Agriculture, Southern Regional Research Laboratories for special analysis of the meals.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1961 by the American Society of Animal Science.