J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1961. 20:514-517.
© 1961 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hogue, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, E. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hogue, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, E. P.

Comparative Utilization of Dietary Calcium and Strontium-90 by Pigs and Sheep

D. E. Hogue, W. G. Pond, C. L. Comar, L. T. Alexander and E. P. Hardy1

Cornell University, Ithaca, New York , U. S. Department of Agriculture,2 and and U. S. Atomic Energy Commission,3

Abstract

The comparative utilization of dietary calcium and of Sr90 was determined in pigs and sheep under typical management conditions by balance feeding trials, radioassay for Sr90 present in feedstuffs in 1958, and chemical analysis for calcium.

A ration consisting of hay from crop year 1958, soybean meal and corn ranged from 74 to 93 µµc Sr90/gm. Ca. The hay contributed about 90% of the Sr90 intake of the animals.

The pigs started with a body burden of 3.7 µµc Sr90/gm. Ca and finished with 9.4; comparative values for the sheep were 30 and 27. For the pigs the comparative utilization of calcium and Sr90 was 48 and 8.6% respectively; values for the sheep were 30 and 6.3%.

In agreement with values for other species, the pigs and sheep utilized Sr90 about 0.2 as effectively as calcium.


Footnotes

1 The authors acknowledge the help of G. H. Wellington and J. R. Stouffer in regard to slaughter of animals, E. J. Thacker and K. E. Beeson for assistance in handling of whole animal carcasses, R. Dever for ashing of the samples, and G. Hamada who performed the analyses.

2 Soil Conservation Service, Plant Industry Station, Beltsville, Maryland.

3 Analytical Division, Health and Safety Lab., N. Y. Operations Office.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1961 by the American Society of Animal Science.