Am. Soc. Anim. Prod.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. Soc. Anim. Prod. 1937:272-277
© 1937 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davison, H. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Davison, H. R.

The Desirability of Carcass Standards of Performance

H. R. Davison

Institute of American Meat Packers

Abstract

Ever since man began selecting animals for meat purposes, his opinion has wavered as to whether his selection should be based on the live animal or the carcass. His chances for error in the live animal have been obvious, and the number of times skillfully fattened animals have proved to be carrying fat tissue where the judge has expected muscular tissue have been all too frequent. Even grand champions at our fat stock shows have suffered this disability on numerous occasions.

So uncertain was that pioneer improver of meat animals, Robert Bakewell, of his ability to determine carcass merits on the basis of external form, that he established a museum of "joints" in which the principal cuts of beef and mutton from his Longhorns and his Dishley Leicesters were preserved in pickle. "The Druid" reports that at Dishley Grange "in the business room there are not only skeletons, but pickled carcasses of sheep whose points were most after the breeder's heart, also he (Bakewell) shows with no less relish some beef joints."







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1937 by the American Society of Animal Science.