J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1960. 19:859-866.
© 1960 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lloyd, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by Beacom, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lloyd, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by Beacom, S. E.

The Effect of Chopping versus Grinding on the Nutritive Value Index of Early versus Late Cut Red Clover and Timothy Hays1

L. E. Lloyd, E. W. Crampton, E. Donefer and S. E. Beacom

Macdonald College, (McGill University),2 Canada

Abstract

  1. The physical form in which a forage was fed had a marked effect on its feeding value. When compared to chopped material, the effect of grinding a forage was to increase significantly its intake and its Nutritive Value Index, the latter being true in spite of a slight reduction in energy digestibility.
  2. In this preliminary study, the stage of maturity of forage had less effect on its feeding value than physical form. A slight reduction in both intake and energy digestibility with advancing maturity contributed to a decrease in the Nutritive Value Indices of the forages—a decrease that was significant but not of the magnitude of the increase observed as a result of grinding.
  3. Red Clover, at the stages of maturity and in the physical forms fed in this test, showed a significantly greater intake and Nutritive Value Index than Timothy.
  4. The highly significant Correlation between animal response and Nutritive Value Index confirmed the usefulness of the latter as a measure of the effective feeding value of a forage.


Footnotes

1 Macdonald College Pasture Committee Series No. XXXIV. This research was assisted financially by the Quebec Agricultural Research Council.

2 Department of Nutrition.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1960 by the American Society of Animal Science.