J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1960. 19:545-552.
© 1960 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Donefer, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lloyd, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Donefer, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lloyd, L. E.

Prediction of the Nutritive Value Index of a Forage from in vitro Rumen Fermentation Data1

E. Donefer, E. W. Crampton and L. E. Lloyd

Macdonald College2 (McGill University), Canada

Abstract

Nine forages, harvested over a period of two years and representing five different species (3 legumes, 2 grasses) cut at various stages of maturity, chopped, and artificially dehydrated, were studied in in vivo and in vitro tests. Ad libitum consumption (relative intake) and energy digestibility were determined in in vivo sheep trials and used to calculate the Nutritive Value Index of each forage.

In vitro cellulose digestion of the forages was determined after 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours of fermentation. When compared to the leguminous species, grasses displayed lag periods in the start of cellulose digestion. These lag periods were reflected in the 12-hour cellulose digestion determination, the latter being highly correlated (r=0.91) with the Nutritive Value Index. It is proposed that the Nutritive Value Index (Y) of a forage may be predicted from the 12-hour in vitro cellulose digestion (X) of that forage according to the equation Y=y+b (X–x). Substituting the values obtained from our present data we obtain Y=48.4+1.314 (X–42.8) or finally Y=–7.8+1.314X.

Future research is indicated in order to widen the scope of forages observed, thus increasing the general applicability of the prediction equation.


Footnotes

1 This investigation was carried out with financial assistance from an Extra-Mural Grant from the Canada Department of Agriculture. A preliminary report of this work was presented before the 51st meeting of the American Society of Animal Production, November, 1959, and the Abstract appears in the J. Animal Sci. 18:1538, 1959.

2 Department of Nutrition.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
C. J. Nelson and J. C. Burns
Fifty Years of Grassland Science Leading to Change
Crop Sci., September 8, 2006; 46(5): 2204 - 2217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1960 by the American Society of Animal Science.