J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1960. 19:538-544.
© 1960 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crampton, E. W.
Right arrow Articles by Lloyd, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Crampton, E. W.
Right arrow Articles by Lloyd, L. E.

A Nutritive Value Index for Forages1

E. W. Crampton, E. Donefer and L. E. Lloyd

Macdonald College2 (McGill University), Canada

Abstract

This paper presents data on the voluntary consumption by sheep of various weights of nine forages that differed in feeding value either because of species of plant or because of stage of maturity when harvested. Digestibility was also measured for each forage, and live weight changes of the sheep recorded. It was found that by computing intake per unit of the metabolic size of the sheep, a description of voluntary intake was obtained that was independent of body weight of sheep (r2=0.058).

The intake of early bloom, chopped, dehydrated legume forage per unit (Wkg.75) was found to be 80±10 gm. per sheep per day. Such forage was designated Standard Forage and the quantity, 80 (Wkg.75), given an arbitrary numerical rating of 100. The relative intake, RI, of other forages was then computed as


Formula

Relative intake of forages multiplied by the percent digestibility of their energy gave figures that were correlated with feeding value as indicated by gain of the sheep fed. The correlations were of the order of r=0.88 to 0.94.

It was proposed therefore that Relative Intake of a forage x its percent energy digestibility be used as a Nutritive Value Index. It is also proposed that this Index can be predicted from in vitro fermentation.


Footnotes

1 Macdonald College Pasture Committee Series No. XXXIII. This research was assisted financially by the Quebec Provincial Research Council.

2 Department of Nutrition.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
C. Stendal and M. D. Casler
Maximizing Efficiency of Recurrent Phenotypic Selection for Neutral Detergent Fiber Concentration in Smooth Bromegrass
Crop Sci., January 24, 2006; 46(1): 297 - 302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
C. Stendal, M. D. Casler, and G. Jung
Marker-Assisted Selection for Neutral Detergent Fiber in Smooth Bromegrass
Crop Sci., January 24, 2006; 46(1): 303 - 311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
M. D. Casler
Divergent Selection for Two Measures of Intake Potential in Smooth Bromegrass
Crop Sci., September 1, 2002; 42(5): 1427 - 1433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1960 by the American Society of Animal Science.