J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1959. 18:1059-1066.
© 1959 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McWard, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McWard, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, A. H.

The Lysine Requirement of Weanling Swine at Two Levels of Dietary Protein

G. W. McWard, D. E. Becker, H. W. Norton, S. W. Terrill and A. H. Jensen1

Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station, Urbana

Abstract

Weanling pigs weighing about 30 lb. were individually fed semi-purified diets containing either 12.8 or 21.7% protein to determine the response to varied levels of lysine. The source of protein was sesame seed meal supplemented with L-histidine. Supplementary lysine was added as L-lysine monohydrochloride.

The rate of gain at the two levels of protein was similar, but the lysine requirement varied with the level of protein fed. At 12.8%. protein the pig required 0.71% lysine in the diet or 5.55% of the dietary protein; and, at 21.7% protein the lysine need was 0.95% of the diet or 4.38% of the dietary protein. Assuming a linear relationship between dietary protein and lysine need, expressed as a percentage of the protein, the need within the protein range studied may be expressed by the equation, Y=7.23–0.131{chi}, where Y is the lysine need and {chi} is the percent of dietary protein.

Expressed as a percent of the total digestible nutrients, the lysine required in the low- and high-protein diets was 0.86 and 1.19%, respectively.


Footnotes

1 The authors wish to acknowledge Merck & Co., Rahway, New Jersey; E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Delaware; The Dow Chemical Co., Midland, Michigan, and Chas. Pfizer & Co.,Inc., Brooklyn, New York, for funds and products which made this study possible.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1959 by the American Society of Animal Science.