J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1958. 17:42-46.
© 1958 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tomlin, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Combs, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tomlin, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Combs, G. E., Jr.

The Influence of Certain Antibiotics on the Palatability of Swine Rations

D. C. Tomlin, H. D. Wallace and G. E. Combs, Jr.

Florida Agricultural Experiment Station, Gainesville1

Abstract

Three experiments involving 62 pigs were conducted to determine the influence of chlortetracycline, oxytetracycline, penicillin V and erythromycin on the palatability of swine rations. Results obtained appear to justify the following statements.

Chlortetracycline enhanced the palatability of swine rations and was much preferred, when a choice was given, over oxytetracycline, penicillin V and erythromycin. Oxytetracycline and penicillin V did not clearly improve or depress the acceptability of feeds containing them.

The results pertaining to erythromycin were very conclusive. Pigs completely avoided feed containing this antibiotic when other feed was available.

Since greater feed consumption is one of the sought-after goals in pork production, care must be exercised to prevent the fortification of growing-fattening swine rations with non-palatable materials. Since erythromycin appears to fall into this category it would seem logical to judge it as an unsuitable antibiotic for swine feeding purposes.


Footnotes

1 Journal Series, No. 629. Department of Animal Husbandry and Nutrition. This study was supported in part by grants from Chas. Pfizer and Co., the American Cyanamid Co., and the Eli Lilly Co.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1958 by the American Society of Animal Science.