J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1958. 17:209-217.
© 1958 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Belasco, I. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kolterman, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Belasco, I. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kolterman, D. W.

The Response of Rumen Microorganisms to Pasture Grasses and Prickly Pear Cactus Following Foliar Application of Urea1

I. J. Belasco, M. F. Gribbins and D. W. Kolterman2

Polychemicals Department, E. I. duPont de Nemours & Co., Inc.

Abstract

THE nutritional quality of grasses depends primarily on the degree of maturity attained by the grass at the time of grazing or harvest. As maturity progresses, feeding quality is lowered. This has been demonstrated by feeding and digestibility experiments, and supported by analyses (Morrison, 1948).

The objective of these tests was to determine whether foliar application of urea to typical pasture grasses would improve their nutritional quality. An artificial rumen technique was used for these evaluations in view of data (Kamstra et al., 1955; Pigden and Bell, 1955) demonstrating the applicability of in vitro techniques in assessing roughage quality. An in vitro rumen technique was also used in these tests to supplement the values obtained in vitro, as well as to provide protein digestibility data on the test forages.

Experimental

In Vitro Rumen Technique. Fermentations, in vitro, with mixed cultures of rumen microorganisms were carried out in Goetz (oil centrifuge) tubes of 100 ml. capacity.


Footnotes

1 Presented at the 48th Meeting of the American Society of Animal Production, November 23–24, 1956.

2 The authors gratefully acknowledge the cooperation of the King Ranch, Inc., Kingsville, Texas, in these studies.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1958 by the American Society of Animal Science.