J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J. Anim Sci. 1957. 16:357-363.
© 1957 American Society of Animal Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sewell, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Carmon, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sewell, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Carmon, J. L.

The Value of Various Blends of Soybean Oil Meal Peanut Oil Meal, and Degossypolized Cottonseed Oil Meal as Protein Supplements in Swine Rations1

R. F. Sewell, B. C. Keen and J. L. Carmon

University of Georgia2

Abstract

THE situation frequently exists where price differentials among the high protein oil meals, as employed in swine feeds and supplements, favor the use of cottonseed oil meal and peanut oil meal, particularly in the areas where these products are processed.

With the advent of low-gossyp01 cottonseed oil meals and the advances in our knowledge of amino, acid requirements and non-protein dietary factors, there is an apparent need for more information concerning the use of these ingredients in swine rations.

Wallace et al. (1955) repo.rted significantly faster gains with pigs receiving a combination of soybean oil meal and low-gossypol cottonseed oil meal as compared to a fortified diet containing soybean oil meal alone.

In chick experiments, Blaylock and Richardson (1950) obtained a growth response to L-lysine supplementation on diets containing a combination of soy bean oil meal and cottonseed o.il meal. In the same study it was indicated that methionine was a limiting factor on a diet containing a combination of soybean oil meal and peanut oil meal.

Footnotes

1 The authors are grateful to the following concerns for supplying materials used in these studies: Buckeye Cotton Oil Co., Cincinnati, O., Lederle Laboratories Division, American Cyanamid Co., Pearl River, N. Y., and Dawes Laboratories, Inc., Chicago, Ill. Acknowledgment is also due Mr. J. R. Danion for assistance in caring for the animals.

2 Contribution from the Department of Animal Husbandry, Athens, Georgia. Journal Paper No. 26 of the College Experiment Station.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1957 by the American Society of Animal Science.